These are terms used throughout this body of work. Click on an item to get more information.

Legend:
  • πŸ‘€ An archetype character in the books or notes
  • πŸ“A term or concept of interest
Characters
  • πŸ‘€ Alnis β€” The archetype of deep tacit knowledge, stewardship, and the memory of steel.
  • πŸ‘€ Amberβ€” University Student
  • πŸ‘€ Fred β€” The archetype of practical wisdom, stewardship, and working with reality rather than theory.
  • πŸ‘€ Josh β€” University Student – The keeper of the Robot
  • πŸ‘€ JudyΒ β€” The archetype of social awareness, relationships, and the human dynamics of organisations.
  • πŸ‘€ Kate β€” The deep listener who helps others slow down, sense uncertainty, and find the ethical boundary.
  • πŸ‘€ Mallory β€” The archetype of constructive scepticism, challenging assumptions and exposing hidden consequences.
  • πŸ‘€ Mary Schultzβ€” Retired IT Manager
  • πŸ‘€ Mario β€” The archetype of systems thinking, helping others see patterns, relationships, and the bigger picture.
  • πŸ‘€ Michael β€” CFO
  • πŸ‘€ Sam Pinoak β€” The archetype adaptive leader whose journey illustrates learning, stewardship, and expanding line of sight.
  • πŸ‘€ Spiro β€” The archetype customer advocate who continually reconnects decisions to human needs and outcomes.
  • πŸ‘€ Bruno β€” The archetype modeller who uses structure, language, and abstraction to create shared understanding.
Glossary of Terms
  • πŸ“ Accountability β€” Responsibility for decisions, actions, outcomes, consequences, and learning, rather than simply being blamed when something goes wrong.
  • πŸ“ Activity Based Costing β€” is a way of understanding the real cost of work by tracing resources through the activities and tasks that consume them.
  • πŸ“ Adaptive Capacity β€” The ability of people, teams, organisations, and communities to learn, adapt, and respond effectively to change.
  • πŸ“Adaptive Enquiry β€” A learning cycle that uses questions, evidence, action, and reflection to adapt to reality.
  • πŸ“ Adaptive Governance β€” Governance that reviews and changes its principles, structures, controls, and decision arrangements as reality, consequence, and organisational learning reveal the need.
  • πŸ“ AI, Human Collaboration & Dialogue Design β€” the disciplined design of human–AI dialogue so AI supports inquiry, sensemaking, learning, and judgement without replacing human responsibility for meaning, ethics, and consequence.
  • πŸ“ Ba β€” A shared context or space where relationships, knowledge, learning, and meaning emerge through interaction.
  • πŸ“ Basho β€” A collective experience of coherence, connection, and shared meaning within a social field.
  • πŸ“ Business Capability Model β€” A representation of what an organisation does, independent of structure, people, or technology.
  • πŸ“ Business Process Management (BPM)Β  β€”Β is the discipline of understanding, designing, improving and governing the processes through which work is performed.
  • πŸ“ Capability OwnershipΒ  β€” Accountability for the coherence, performance, development, and consequences of a capability across functions, processes, systems, information, roles, and organisational boundaries.
  • πŸ“Critical Thinking β€” The disciplined testing of assumptions, claims, evidence, and conclusions.
  • πŸ“Consequence β€” The real-world effect of action; broader than Consequential Intervention, which is a deliberate act that creates consequence.
  • πŸ“ Consequential Intervention β€” An intervention designed to influence outcomes by working with consequences rather than imposing control.
  • πŸ“ Common Data Model β€” A high-level representation of the key subjects and relationships important to an organisation.
  • πŸ“ Data Quality and Information Quality β€” The fitness of data and information for purpose
  • πŸ“ Data Ownership β€” Stewardship of the meaning, quality, use, protection, and lifecycle of data so it can be trusted in decisions, operations, reporting, AI, and learning.
  • πŸ“ Decision Rights β€” The explicit authority to make particular decisions, within agreed boundaries, with clear responsibility for consequences.
  • πŸ“ Design Thinking and Strategic Thinking β€” The ability to explore possibilities, anticipate consequences, and choose design options or shape future direction.
  • πŸ“ Dialogue, Dialectic & Debate β€” Conversation types used for different purposes in advocacy and enquiry in the quest to seek truth and understanding.
  • πŸ“ Double-Loop Learning β€” Learning that challenges underlying assumptions, beliefs, and mental models rather than simply improving actions.
  • πŸ“ DSRPΒ β€” A systems thinking framework based on Distinctions, Systems, Relationships, and Perspectives.
  • πŸ“ Ecocentric vs Egocentric Thinking β€” A worldview that considers the wellbeing of the broader economic, social, and ecological system versus individual or organisational self-interest.
  • πŸ“ Enterprise Architecture β€” The practice of creating shared organisational understanding through models and structured knowledge
  • πŸ“ Ethics Β β€” The discipline of deciding what ought to be done by considering purpose, affected stakeholders, foreseeable consequences, and the boundaries that should not be crossed.
  • πŸ“ Ethical AI Governance β€” The governance of AI use so purpose, permitted use, data, accountability, human judgement, contestability, and downstream consequences
  • πŸ“Β Explicit Knowledge and Tacit Knowledge β€” Two interdependent forms of knowledge: one that can be documented and shared through artefacts, and one carried in experience, judgement, practice, and context.
  • πŸ“ Feedback β€” Information about the results of actions that supports learning, adaptation, and improvement.
  • πŸ“ Gemba β€” The place where reality teaches and learning becomes unavoidable.
  • πŸ“ Governance β€” The discipline of making decisions coherent, responsible, and connected to purpose, evidence, risk, accountability, and consequence.
  • πŸ“ Governance Ownership β€” Accountability for keeping governance visible, coherent, relevant, effective, and aligned with purpose, ethics, reality, and consequence.
  • πŸ“ Great Inertia β€” The tendency of individuals, organisations, and systems to resist meaningful change.
  • πŸ“ Hansei β€” The practice of deep reflection to learn from experience and improve future actions.
  • πŸ“ Human as the Integration Layer β€” The role people play in connecting information, knowledge, context, and meaning across systems.
  • πŸ“Informed Judgement β€” The practical use of evidence, experience, context, diverse perspectives, and ethical reasoning to decide and act under uncertainty.
  • πŸ“ Islands of Coherence β€” Groups of people who develop shared understanding, trust, and coordinated action around a common purpose.
  • πŸ“ Kanban Architecture β€”Β Architecture pulled by need, tested at Gemba, governed through the Knowledge Base
  • πŸ“ Knowledge Base β€” AΒ  structured repository of organisational knowledge that provides a shared understanding of how an organisation operates
  • πŸ“ Knowledge Operating System (KOS) β€” The structures, practices, and relationships that enable knowledge to flow and create value.
  • πŸ“ Line of Sight β€” The ability to see and understand the consequences, relationships, and realities relevant to a situation.
  • πŸ“ Managing Complexity β€” The practice of working effectively with uncertainty, emergence, and interconnected systems.
  • πŸ“ Mindsets β€” Thinking drives action. Action drives consequences
  • πŸ“ Operating Model β€” the working configuration of capabilities, work, roles, decisions, information, systems, governance, measures, cost, partners, and learning routines through which an organisation turns purpose and strategy into action and consequence
  • πŸ“ Organisational Awareness β€” The 24/7 radar that scans the business environment seeking week signals
  • πŸ“ Organisational Coherence β€” The condition where purpose, capability, work, information, systems, decisions, measures, accountability, and consequence fit together well enough for the organisation to act as a whole.
  • πŸ“ Organisational Learning Ecosystem β€” The living network of relationships, knowledge, culture, and interactions within an organisation.
  • πŸ“ Organisational Regenerationβ€” Rebuilding the human, social, knowledge and organisational foundations depleted through restructuring, short term thinking, fragmentation and repeated transformation.
  • πŸ“ Phronesis β€” Practical wisdom: the judgement to act well in context, under uncertainty.
  • πŸ“ Psychological Safety β€” A shared belief that people can speak openly without fear of punishment or humiliation.
  • πŸ“ Purpose β€” The organisation compass that gives direction, coherence, and meaning to action.
  • πŸ“ Regeneration β€” Restoring and enhancing the capacity of people, organisations, communities and ecosystems to renew and flourish.
  • πŸ“ Regenerative CapacityΒ  β€” Adaptive capacity embedded within a healthy social ecology and connected to ecological reality.
  • πŸ“ Regenerative MomentumΒ  β€” The reinforcing dynamic through which improving capability, trust, relationships and ecological health increases a system’s capacity to continue renewing itself.
  • πŸ“ Risk Governanceβ€” The discipline of connecting uncertainty and exposure to consequence with ownership, attention, judgement, escalation, and timely intervention.
  • πŸ“ Scout Mindset β€” An orientation toward seeking the best available understanding of reality rather than defending a preferred position.
  • πŸ“ Scenario Planning β€” A structured approach to exploring multiple plausible futures and their implications.
  • πŸ“ SECI β€” A model describing how tacit and explicit knowledge interact to create organisational learning.
  • πŸ“ Sensemaking β€” The process of interpreting experiences and information to create understanding and guide action.
  • πŸ“ Shared Mental Models β€” Common understandings that help people coordinate decisions and actions effectively.
  • πŸ“ Social Ecology β€” The evolving network of people, communities, institutions, practices, knowledge systems and relationships through which understanding, collective action and stewardship become possible.
  • πŸ“ Stakeholder Engagement β€” is the practice of identifying, understanding and working with the people, groups or entities affected by, or capable of affecting, an organisation’s activities.
  • πŸ“ Stewardship β€” Responsible care for a system, capability, relationship, or shared future over time.
  • πŸ“ Sustainability β€” Maintaining the ecological, social, human, institutional and economic conditions required for continued existence and responsible future action.
  • πŸ“ Tacit Withdrawal β€” The loss of tacit judgement and understanding while formal processes and behaviours remain.
  • πŸ“ Tacit Withholding β€” The conscious or conditioned withholding of concerns, observations, uncertainty, or judgement when speaking feels unsafe, futile, or unwelcome.
  • πŸ“ The Common Good β€” The shared conditions that enable people, communities, organisations, and ecological systems to flourish, rather than privileging narrow or short-term interests.
  • πŸ“ Theory U β€” A framework for transformation based on sensing, presencing, and emerging future possibilities.
  • πŸ“ Triple Bottom Line β€” A framework that evaluates performance across social, environmental, and economic outcomes.
  • πŸ“Trust β€” The willingness to rely on others in situations involving uncertainty, vulnerability, and interdependence.
  • πŸ“ Value Stream β€” The end-to-end flow of activities through which value is created, delivered, protected, or damaged for a stakeholder.